|
|
FACTSHEET FOURTEENALCOHOLIC ‘SOFT DRINKS’ AND YOUNG PEOPLE It
is generally accepted that there is an increasing problem with under-aged
drinking within the United Kingdom. This
is highlighted by a report of the Royal College of Physicians in 1995. apas believes that the advent of the new alcohol ‘soft’
drinks (alco-pops) exacerbates the situation.
These products have an average Alcohol By Volume (ABV) of 5.5%, which is
stronger than most beers and lagers. The
producers of these drinks maintain their target audience is the 18 to 25 year
old bracket. Undoubtedly, these
products appeal to people below the age of 18.
The colourful, if not gaudy packaging, with fancy graphics and cartoons,
seems to be aimed at the younger market. These
products provide an easy introduction to alcohol for young people and for those
who have not otherwise acquired a taste for alcohol, since the taste is masked
by the cola, lemonade, etc in the container.
The sweetness of these products is a stepping-stone to harder alcoholic
drinks for the immature palate of young people. It
is known that one in twenty 11 to 15 year old boys and girls drink more than the
maximum amount of alcohol recommended for adults. Therefore, attempts to attract young people to consume
alcohol are not helpful. apas
has a serious concern that young people inexperienced in handling alcohol will
lead them to drink more in a single session than they would intend, particularly
when these products are consumed. There
is already evidence
The drinks trade defend themselves against the criticism levelled by claiming that such products are aimed at young but not under-aged drinkers and that their labelling clearly contains the word alcohol (or alcoholic). apas regards the labelling and marketing of these products as misleading and applauds the action taken by certain local pub chains (e.g. Tynemill) in withdrawing these products from their outlets. Off licences should be left in no doubt that these drinks should not be sold to under 18's. There is a responsibility for the magistrates to consider the action they might take.
An example is that of Glasgow, where the licensing board have stipulated that alco-pops are always displayed with other alcoholic drinks and not adjacent to soft drinks.
It is understood that levels of alcohol can vary considerably between different brands of alcoholic soft drinks. It is therefore important that all drinkers, particularly those who are driving or working machinery, can be clear about how much alcohol they are consuming. The attached list (appendix 1), whilst not exhaustive, is an attempt to provide information on alcoholic content for young people, parents and health and social workers.
Recently, the Portman, a body set up by the big seven drinks producers in the United Kingdom, agreed to draw up a voluntary code of practice to mitigate against alcoholic soft drinks overtly appealing to underage drinkers.
The Portman Group's Code of Practice
Initially it was hoped that the code would seek to ensure that alcoholic soft drinks did not use descriptors which are generic names for soft drinks such as cola or lemonade, so as to draw a clear distinction between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks. However this aim has been dropped and instead the code states that these terms should be used with the utmost care.
The code states the names of drinks should not encourage irresponsible consumption of alcohol, be more likely to appeal to under 18's than to adults through use of imagery or allusion, nor suggest an association with violent, aggressive, dangerous or anti-social behaviour, or suggest sexual success or prowess.
In terms of packaging, the alcoholic nature and strength of the drink should be clearly marked, although no interpretation of "clearly" is provided in terms of size of lettering and positioning of information. Characters and motifs clearly established as popular with under-18s culture should not be used in designs, and containers should not imply association with anti-social behaviour.
The code urges retailers to ensure that licensing laws are adhered to, that alcoholic products are kept separately from non-alcoholic drinks, and that staff undertake relevant training. It also sets out the mechanisms for administration of the code and lodging a complaint.
While welcoming the code as a step in the right direction, such a code can only be effective if firstly, all producers, distributors and retailers were to sign up to it, and secondly, an independent body was placed in charge of considering complaints and monitoring the code. Ideally the code needs to be set within a statutory framework to achieve such a level of effectiveness, with scrutiny by an independent body to ensure producers, distributors and retailers are adhering to it.
As it stands, the code has been drawn up by the drinks industry for the drinks industry, and complaints will be heard by the Portman group itself, some of whose members actually produce the alco-pops.
However, an opportunity nevertheless exists for the magistrates, campaigning groups like apas, and the Advertising Standards Authority, to take action in partnership against these products. A group of concerned parents has been brought together, following contacts with apas, to lobby at a parliamentary and local level.
It remains for parents, youth and community workers and staff in schools to give clear messages to children about alco-pops, and the harm alcohol can cause. apas would strongly support a levy on the advertising of all alcoholic products, as is common-place in the United States of America, to fund the programmes that will assist children and teenagers to handle alcohol in a responsible and acceptable manner.
Appendix 2 provides suggestions for specific and productive action for individuals and organisations with major concerns about alco-pops and who want to do something tangible about them.
References:
1. Newcombe R et al. A survey of drinking and deviant behaviour among fourteen to fifteen year olds in North West England. Addiction Research Vol 2, No 4, pp319-41
2. Beattie JO et al. Children intoxicated by alcohol in Nottingham and Glasgow 1973-1984. British Medical Journal Vol 292, pp519-21
Appendix 1
Alcoholic "Soft" Drinks: Units and Strengths
Product ABV Size Units Alcola 4% 330ml 1.3 Aqua V 5% 275ml 1.4 Bacardi Breezer 5.4% 350ml 1.9 Castaway 4.5% 200ml 1 Cisco 15% 750ml 11.3 187ml 2.8 Cola / Lemon Lips 5% 750ml 3.8 Diamond Zest 5% 275ml btl 1.4 330ml can 1.7 Hoolahan's 4% 275ml 1.1 Hooper's Hooch 4.7% 330ml 1.6 Hooper's Ginger Brew 4.7% 330ml 1.6 Huckers's Cola 4.9% - - Lemonhead 4.9% - - Mad Macaulay's 5% 275ml 1.4 Max 5% 275ml 1.4 MD 20/20 13.1% 750ml 9.8 187ml 2.5 Memphis Mist 4.9% 330ml 1.6 Mog 4% - - Mrs McCoys Alcoholic Lemonade 4% 350ml 1.4 Mrs Pucker's Alcoholic Drinks 5.5% 750ml 4.1 275ml 1.5 Piranha 4.3% 330ml 1.4 Ravers 13% - - Red Raw 5% Safari Chiller Shock 8.4% 250ml 2.1 Stassen's 4% 750ml 3 Test Tube Cocktails 15% 50ml 1 TNT Dynamite 8.4% 275ml 2.3 Tilt Caribbean Crush 5.5% 330ml 1.8 Tom Foggett's Grog 4% 330ml 1.3 Two Dogs Vault 5.3% - - V6 5.5% 275ml 1.5 Woody's 4.7% 330ml 1.6 Zanzebi Sling 5% - -
APPENDIX 2
IDEAL FOR LOCAL ACTION TO PROVOKE NATIONAL ACTION ON ALCO-POPS
Names and products descriptors should not:
Packaging or point of sale materials should ensure that:
When merchandising products, retailers should ensure that:
Complaints should detail the name of the product(s) and the section code you think it is breaching, and sent to:
The Portman Group, 7-10 Chandos Street, Cavendish Square, London W1G 9DQ
It is particularly important that complaints are submitted, otherwise the drinks industry will assume that concerns about alco-pops being designed to appeal to children and teenagers are not widely held and therefore there is little justification for taking action to stop it happening. |